salut

**bercy_92** · 21-06-2008 10:13

imi explica si mie cineva cum sta treaba cu amd-urile astia?
Am un AMD Athlon 64 3000+ ~1.8Ghz.
Am intrat pe siteul www.systemrequirementslab.com si am intrat la un joc la care scria ca ai tre 2.8ghz.
Scria passed

rocessor amd amd athlon 64 1.8ghz rated at 3ghz.
cum vine treaba ca chiar nu mai inteleg.
ms mult

**TheDogg** · 21-06-2008 11:22

shi itzi merge jokul?

**bercy_92** · 21-06-2008 12:00

Mesaj iniţiat de TheDogg

shi itzi merge jokul?

da imi merge perfect
asta nu inteleg
nu puteau sa scrie direct ca e de 3 ghz?

**Papi_Eib** · 21-06-2008 12:18

You Have: 2.21 GHz Performance Rated at 6.30 GHz ( la mine pe x2 4200+)
Cine stie ce algoritm foloseste

**2fast** · 21-06-2008 12:19

De cand au aparut Athlonurile parca AMD spunea ca un procesor 2000+ este echivalent cu un procesor (de la alta firma

) de 2000 Mhz (dpdv al performantei).
http://www.pugetsystems.com/articles.php?id=1
"For example, the Athlon XP series has a processor that runs at 1.5GHz, and they have named the processor the 1800+. You can see what they're doing. They know that their 1.5GHz processor is the equivalent to a 1.8GHz Pentium4, so they have given it that label "

**Papi_Eib** · 21-06-2008 12:22

Mesaj iniţiat de 2fast

De cand au aparut Athlonurile parca AMD spunea ca un procesor 2000+ este echivalent cu un procesor (de la alta firma

) de 2000 Mhz (dpdv al performantei).
http://www.pugetsystems.com/articles.php?id=1
"For example, the Athlon XP series has a processor that runs at 1.5GHz, and they have named the processor the 1800+. You can see what they're doing. They know that their 1.5GHz processor is the equivalent to a 1.8GHz Pentium4, so they have given it that label "

aia stiam si eu.... lui macar ii 3 ghz la 3000+, dar eu nu am 6300+

echivalentu unui procesor 6300 mhz "de la o alta firma"

Cred ca il deruteaza x2 ala