:P
Versiune pentru imprimare
:P
:blink:
De acord si mie mi se pare urata.Citat:
Mesaj iniţiat de Thanatos
ont: spatele parca vine de la alta masina...
http://cdn.anunt.auto.ro/images/merc...80-1211229.jpg
http://www.carsexotic.org/images/Lam...Murcielago.jpg
rapide super-carurile astea dar urate rau frate, cine le-o cumpara? :-<
asa e, mult mai jmeker e un benve 316Citat:
Mesaj iniţiat de cata TCL
on:
Ce ai pus tu e un concept, Alfa Romeo Brera arata altfel, si in plus, a fost aleasa Cea mai frumoasa masina din lume in 2005 sau 2006, dar fiecare cu gusturile lui. Mie unul imi place.Citat:
Mesaj iniţiat de andrei.andrei
O masina rapida sau scumpa sau exclusivista nu este neaparat si frumosa ;)Citat:
Mesaj iniţiat de cata TCL
De exemplu: MC12 este o masina incredibil de frumoasa, dar nu pot sa zic ca imi place foarte mult, prefer un Enzo care este mai urat estetic.
Numai aerodinamica nu e partea din fata. Uite o masina aerodinamica la partea frontala http://www.911classic.co.uk/Images/a...scheLeMans.jpg . O masina aerodinamica are partea frontala cat mai joasa ca sa taie aerul mai bine, Veyron-ul o face prin forta bruta, daca ar avea alt design la partea frontala ar fi si mai rapida ;)Citat:
Mesaj iniţiat de JaMb0
Veyron - It has a drag coefficient of 0.41 (normal condition) and 0.36 (after lowering to the ground), and a frontal area of 2.07 square metres (22.3 sq ft). This gives it a CdA value of 8.0 sq ft (0.74 m2).
Alfa 155 - Built to replace the 75 and based on the parent Fiat Group's Tipo platform, the 155 was somewhat larger in dimension than the 75 but evolved its styling from that of its predecessor. The 155 was designed by Italian design house I.D.E.A. Institute. A exceptional drag coefficient of 0.29 was achieved with the body design.
Nissan GT-R - The GT-R has a drag coefficient of 0.27.
Ferrari Enzo - The Enzo has an aerodynamic drag coefficient as poor as 0.36, virtually back to the Testarossa era. However, like Formula 1 cars, its emphasis is on downforce and therefore handling.
Maseratti MC12 aka Enzo cu alta caroserie - 0.30 (abia l-am gasit)...
Veyronul nu este chiar atat de aerodinamic pe cat ai zice, nici cand e lasata jos pt a atinge 407km/h.
Urmatoarea masina urata de care am dat tot cautand masini aerodinamice... Citroen SM
Many of the details reflect Opron's American background, notably the vestiges of 'fins' at the rear. Opron worked on aircraft body design and aerodynamics while in the USA, and the SM benefited from this experience. It was unusually aerodynamic for its era, with a very low drag coefficient of 0.26. The SM was one of the first production cars to benefit from extensive wind tunnel testing during its design phase, and as a result aerodynamic efficiency influenced the final design of many details including the shape of the side mirror, the method of windshield sealing, and the underbelly of the car which featured active aerodynamics, effectively sucking the car to the road at high speed. Even the ventilation intake is located in a "neutral" area on the hood, which makes the ventilator fan regulate the interior ventilation at all road speeds.
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedi...kholm_rear.jpg
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedi...SM_at_Anet.jpg
S-au chinuti atat de mult sa o faca aerodinamica dar spatele este de-a dreptul oribil :(
adevaru' e ca si aerodinamica si frumoasa (asa cum ne place noua) e cam greu de realizat.Citat:
Mesaj iniţiat de Thanatos
on:
http://img222.imageshack.us/img222/7...30xdjtfjfs.jpg
Nissan GT-R - The GT-R has a drag coefficient of 0.27. Nu pot sa zic ca e foarte frumoasa (agresiva da), dar imi place la nebunie, si mai sunt altele si aerodinamice si cu design frumos...dar mai putine.Citat:
Mesaj iniţiat de JaMb0
Perodua Kenari
http://storage0.dms.mpinteractiv.ro/...jpg?width=1600
:P
Renault
spatele de nexia </3. sigur a mai fost postata.
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedi...r_GTX_Heck.JPG